VP Pick As An Anchor

Four years ago, The Republican presidential nominee had to select a running mate.  This list from Wikipedia is more comprehensive than the prominent names I have listed.

U.S. Senators


Sarah Palin was the winner of the VP-Stakes and was disastrous for the McCain campaign, specifically, and for all Republicans, more generally.

Fast forward four years.  It would seem apparent as we approach the last week in September, that the Republicans have learned exactly – 0 – when it come to selecting a VP candidate.

Here is the Wikipedia list, I need not take up space with the names here.

Prior to the selection of Rep Paul Ryan (R) WI as Romney’s running mate, Romney had so many “etch-a-sketch” moments that most of the public really did not know where he stood on any one issue.  And the polls showed, figuratively speaking, a neck-and-neck-horse-race between the President and the Challenger.

By selecting Ryan, and by extension the Ryan budget, all ambiguity has been removed from the likely voters mind.  In the last month and especially after the Republican convention, there has been a slow erosion of support for the Republican positions and the incumbent, President Obama, has opened up a five plus point lead.

One explanation of the Ryan budget cuts

What exactly does Ryan want to cut? Here, a brief guide:

Where is Ryan focusing his cuts?
As it was the last time around, the centerpiece of Ryan’s plan is his proposal to transform Medicare into a system of subsidized private insurance plans — only this time he’s suggesting offering seniors the option of buying into the traditional “fee-for-service” program. Over the next 10 years, Ryan’s plan would shave $205 billion in Medicare spending. Then more savings would roll in as the Medicare eligibility age gradually climbed from 65 to 67. Ryan hopes to save another $810 billion in federal spending on Medicaid over the next decade. But he’s proposing even bigger cuts elsewhere.

What programs would face the biggest reductions?
All of the government’s entitlement programs, including welfare, food stamps, agricultural subsidies ($30 billion), and transportation, would come under the chopping block. Together, they’d account for $2 trillion in spending cuts. Ryan’s plan — which, by the way, has essentially zero chance of passing in the Democratic-controlled Senate — calls for spending 13 percent less on veterans, 6 percent less on science, space, and technology, and 25 percent less on transportation projects, such as upgrading roads and bridges.

Here is the full tape/video recording of the now infamous, Romney talk at a $50,000-a-plate dinner.

$50,000-a-plate?  How many of you readers, not ‘could afford a dinner that expensive,’ no my question is how many of you make $50,000 a year?  Dwell on that.  How much money must one make a year to be able to spend that much to help someone gain the Presidency?

Explore posts in the same categories: Politics

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: