Archive for March 22, 2008

Poll Shows Americans Want Government To Take Public Opinion More Seriously

March 22, 2008

A new poll seeking to measure public attitudes toward government and participatory democracy is out, and it’s showing some truly extraordinary results: Americans are not happy with the state of democracy in this country:

  • When asked whether government leaders should consider public opinion polls in making decisions, 81 percent said they should.
  • When asked whether the public’s participation in democracy should be limited to voting in elections (as Dana Perino believes), “… 94 percent [said] that government leaders should pay attention to the views of the public between elections.”
  • When asked whether the country is run with the benefit of all the people in mind, or just for the benefit of a small number of corporate interests, a stunning 80% said the country is run for the benefit of a small number of corporate interests.

Conclusions:

The net effect seems to be a diminished trust in government. Asked, “How much of the time do you think you can trust the national government in Washington to do what is right?” 60 percent say “only some of the time” while 37 percent say most of the time and 3 percent just about always.

Steven Kull, director of WorldPublicOpinion.org and PIPA, comments, “While Americans do not say that leaders should always follow the will of the public, they do think that American leaders should be considerably more responsive to the people and should even pay attention to polls. Dismissing the public as irrelevant and incompetent only contributes to already low levels of trust in government.”

Reading Comprehension in the Blogosphere

March 22, 2008

I never truly appreciated, before starting to blog and read blogs, that reading comprehension is a higher order literacy skill. I hadn’t really thought of it before, but every day I run across examples of interpretation, spin, and personal bias being mistaken for inherent meaning.

One current example:

Errol Louis, a columnist at the NY Daily News, writes about the latest example in the Wright-Obama flap, of lifting a quote snippet out of its context, and then mining it for sinister meanings:

There’s a new anti-Obama storyline whipping through cyberspace at the speed of stupid.

Put simply, some Internet nitwits say Obama’s comment that his white grandmother – who made racist remarks and was fearful of blacks – was a “typical white person” just proves he can’t stop alienating white voters.

Never mind that Obama’s point, made casually Thursday on a Philadelphia radio show, was to emphasize the important truth that whites, including his elderly grandmother, are slowly winning the fight to purge their hearts of poisonous prejudices.

That message was swiftly discarded as a gaggle of bloggers and correspondents – whose collective contribution to an honest national dialogue about race has been nil – pounced.

Barack Obama basically called all white people racist,” wrote blogger/radio show host Taylor Marsh on the Huffington Post, neatly avoiding the inconvenient fact that such a libel from the biracial candidate would include (or half-include) himself.

Other political Web sites echoed Marsh’s sentiment – Oooh! He said ‘white person’! Now he can’t be President! – and conservatives dutifully added it to their talking points.

Here is the snippet in context — and note the lies in this news source as well:

Obama is drawing a new round of criticism for his comments on a Philadelphia radio sports program yesterday in which he said his grandmother is a “typical white person” who has fears about black men. He was attempting to explain a portion of his speech on race earlier this week—specifically, the statement that his white grandmother gets nervous when a black man approaches her on the street.

Obama told the radio host, “The point I was making was not that Grandmother harbors any racial animosity. She doesn’t. But she is a typical white person, who, if she sees somebody on the street that she doesn’t know, you know, there’s a reaction that’s been bred in our experiences that don’t go away and that sometimes come out in the wrong way, and that’s just the nature of race in our society.” Obama was already drawing flak for his association with a controversial preacher in Chicago who has made anti-American and antiwhite comments.

Actually, uh, no. The “controversial preacher in Chicago” did not make anti-American and antiwhite comments — as Roland Martin found out when he listened to the post-9/11 sermon Rev. Wright preached in its entirety.

But getting backing to Obama’s “typical white person” remarks, aside from the inconvenient fact Louis pointed out — that Obama is half-white himself — can you point to the place where Obama said that “all white people are racist”? Or, come to that, do you see where he used the word “racist” at all in that quote?

No, I can’t, either. That’s because he didn’t.

If I say, “The typical American would rather have a hot fudge sundae than a plate of lima beans,” am I basically saying that all Americans are fat?

“But, but, but,” I can hear the sputtering, “obesity is a serious problem in this country!”

Uh, hello? So is stereotyped thinking about black men — and black people in general.

Fox Lied About Wright 9/11 Sermon

March 22, 2008

Yesterday morning, Roland Martin wrote a post titled, “The Full Story Behind Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s 9/11 Sermon.”

As this whole sordid episode regarding the sermons of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright has played out over the last week, I wanted to understand what he ACTUALLY said in this speech. I’ve been saying all week on CNN that context is important, and I just wanted to know what the heck is going on.

I have now actually listened to the sermon Rev. Wright gave after September 11 titled, “The Day of Jerusalem’s Fall.” It was delivered on Sept. 16, 2001. One of the most controversial statements in this sermon was when he mentioned “chickens coming home to roost.” He was actually quoting Edward Peck, former U.S. Ambassador to Iraq and deputy director of President Reagan’s terrorism task force, who was speaking on FOX News. That’s what he told the congregation.

Here is the YouTube video of the entire sermon in question (via Marc Ambinder).

The gist of Rev. Wright’s sermon was: Look inward, to your own family, your own self, your own community and society, to make change:

He went on to describe seeing the photos of the aftermath of 9/11 because he was in Newark, N.J., when the planes struck. After turning on the TV and seeing the second plane slam into one of the twin towers, he spoke passionately about what if you never got a chance to say hello to your family again.

“What is the state of your family?” he asked.

And then he told his congregation that he loved them and asked the church to tell each other they loved themselves.

His sermon thesis:

1. This is a time for self-examination of ourselves and our families.

2. This is a time for social transformation (then he went on to say they won’t put me on PBS or national cable for what I’m about to say. Talk about prophetic!)

“We have got to change the way we have been doing things as a society,” he said.

Wright then said we can’t stop messing over people and thinking they can’t touch us. He said we may need to declare war on racism, injustice, and greed, instead of war on other countries.

“Maybe we need to declare war on AIDS. In five minutes the Congress found $40 billion to rebuild New York and the families that died in sudden death, do you think we can find the money to make medicine available for people who are dying a slow death? Maybe we need to declare war on the nation’s healthcare system that leaves the nation’s poor with no health coverage? Maybe we need to declare war on the mishandled educational system and provide quality education for everybody, every citizen, based on their ability to learn, not their ability to pay. This is a time for social transformation.”

3. This is time to tell God thank you for all that he has provided and that he gave him and others another chance to do His will.

Whether or not you agree with Wright’s analysis, this is worlds different from what the truncated clips of this particular sermon — played over and over, as Obama said, in an endless loop — showed.

In a word, Fox lied.

She Nails It

March 22, 2008

I found this piece by Jill at Brilliant at Breakfast titled “Now Here Is An Issue That Should Be Getting More Attention” that succinctly nails the duplicity of Bush and his lackeys. It should be required reading by everyone before they eat again.

Thought of the Day

March 22, 2008

I do not see how criticizing others for their faith can be productive, either to my salvation, or to the Church.

Anonymous